[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...>
• Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:24:36 +1100
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B2543A4@l...>
• Sender: news <news@s...>

"DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...> wrote in message 
FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B2543A4@l...">news:FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B2543A4@l......
> Jonathan Robie wrote:
>>Dimitre Novatchev
>
>>> To avoid recursion in tree processing (isn't this what XSLT and XQuery
>>> are all about)? This should be impossible by definition.
>
>>I think you are confusing recursive data structures, which both languages
> must be
>>able to handle, with recursive algorithms.
>
> To amplify what Jonathan wrote, by recursion I was referring to algorithms
> and not data structures--in particular, the use of XSLT 1.0 named 
> templates
> that call themselves to accomplish things that can be accomplished more
> intuitively for most people with procedural code in other languages. For
> example, the repetition of something a fixed number of times.


And by recursive processing I meant such simple and fundamental things like 
the identity transformation (XSLT 1.0 terminology):

<xsl:template match="@*|node()">
  <xsl:copy>
    <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
  </xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>

Overriding the identity template rule (XSLT 2.0 terminology) provides an 
elegant and powerful pattern for solving a large class of tree 
transformation problems.
Compared to it, the non-recursive solutions are more clumsy and unnatural 
and in some cases may be very difficult to produce.

There are different types of programmers -- it is as difficult for followers 
of the functional programming school not to use recursion as to use 
recursion for programmers from the procedural school.

But this reflects individual way of thinking -- not the nature of the 
problems being solved, large group of which are inherently recursive.

Cheers,

Dimitre.

>
> When I mentioned XSLT developers who don't use recursion in an earlier
> posting, I was referring to the ones who avoid the use of recursive named
> templates.
>
> Bob DuCharme   www.snee.com/bob       <bob@
> snee.com> weblog on linking-related topics:
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1191
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
> 

• References:
  • RE: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>

• Prev by Date: Connecting xml to xsl
• Next by Date: Re: Connecting xml to xsl
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Next by thread: xml-stylesheet or <style>
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread