[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: [xml-d

• To: 'Peter Hunsberger' <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Subject: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:00:17 -0600
• Cc: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>, xml-dev@l...

I won't go quite that far.   I may need to create a schema for 
others to inspect because I don't want to open up an ODBC 
connection for them to my metadata tables.   In that case, 
providing an XML Schema for them to consume or its analog 
(the mammals are relentless reinovators), makes sense. 
I agree that in the environment I work in, modeling in 
XML Schema isn't very useful.

len


From: Peter Hunsberger [mailto:peter.hunsberger@g...]

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:46:39 -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
<len.bullard@i...> wrote:

> OTW, a property bag is a property bag is a property bag.

Or as Burak just wrote on the "Describing hierarchies with XML"  thread:

> [Singing the song of OO abstraction] "Model common things only once."

The fact is, the best model isn't always (ever? :-) an XML schema...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by Date: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread