Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:43:23 +0000 (GMT), Richard Tobin <richard@i...> wrote: <snip>why people don't get recursion</snip> > While this may be true, it's certainly a deficiency of XSLT that it > often requires you to use recursion to perform tasks that are more > naturally described in a non-recursive way. A programmer may be quite > happy using recursion to implement tasks he thinks of as recursive, > but still find it frustrating to translate, say, simple string-editing > to a recursive algorithm. I don't think I'd call it a deficiency, but yes one person's natural act might be painful for another... I'd be willing to hazard a guess that there's a percentage of people who get recursion but find translating it into the XSLT syntax the straw that breaks the Camel's back, so to speak? I'm usually OK with the XSLT syntax up until the point I've got to do something like you describe. At that point the syntax becomes heavy weight enough that writing the simple algorithm with all that extra verbiage is a pain. I think this is something where XSLT 2 and XPath 2 help a lot, with them, for some things, recursion is no longer necessary... -- Peter Hunsberger
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format