[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: UPA and schema handling

• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: UPA and schema handling
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:48:00 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200410222154.i9MLsFV09885@d...>
• References: <87lldyv5zk.fsf@n...> <41729D89.6020906@u...> <4172BD45.7040409@o...> <4172F10A.1070002@u...> <4173151B.90700@o...> <4173201E.20001@u...> <f5bu0smra97.fsf@e...> <41794B8B.9080709@m...> <200410222154.i9MLsFV09885@d...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

Joe English wrote:


>>From=203.2.1 of XML 1.0 3e, it seems pretty clear to me:
>>
>>   For compatibility, it is an error if the content model allows an
>>   element to match more than one occurrence of an element type in the
>>   content model.


But it's not a fatal error. According to the spec an error that is not a 
fatal error denotes a "violation of the rules of this specification; 
results are undefined. Unless otherwise specified, failure to observe a 
prescription of this specification indicated by one of the keywords 
MUST, REQUIRED, MUST NOT, SHALL and SHALL NOT is an error. Conforming 
software MAY detect and report an error and MAY recover from it."

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• References:
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • UPA and schema handling
    • From: Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...>
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...>
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...>
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: UPA and schema handling
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by Date: Re: UPA and schema handling
• Previous by thread: Re: UPA and schema handling
• Next by thread: Re: UPA and schema handling
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread