|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [Shannon: information ~ uncertainty] Ramifications to XML
> QUESTIONS > > 1. How does this aspect (information ~ uncertainty) of Shannon's work relate > to data exchange using XML? That is a rather broad question, like "how does Newton's work relate to the construction industry?" My guess is that XML is somewhat against the grain of Shannon's thought (without contradicting it) : The point of markup is to add redundancy so as to increase the probability of information surviving noisy channels or the passage of time that tend to degrade shared assumptions about the inherent structure of messages. Binary data is pretty meaningless without knowing the way the bits are broken up into fields, the byte-order of the integers, etc. XML is more akin to natural language with its redundancy, irrelevancies, etc., which Shannon was trying to factor out. > > 2. A schema is used to restrict the allowable forms that an instance > document may take. So doesn't a schema reduce information? Right, that's the whole point. This is most easily seen in schema-based data compression along the lines of ASN.1 -- If you constrain the diversity of information that could be exchanged, then it takes fewer bits on the wire to convey something meaningful. More generally, schemas reduce the set of possible markup and values within the markup, so they reduce the expressiveness of one authoring according to the schema. The value offered in return is that the shared assumptions about inherent structures of messages make it easier for stupid machines to "validate" the messages, for simple programs to make effective use of the messages, etc.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








