[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Partyin' like it's 1999


Re:  Partyin' like it's 1999
Then, If XML Namespaces are a *big mess*, which other alternatives can be designed to address the problems that the XML Namespaces spec covers?
 
Regards,
 
Sergio Rodríguez. 

"Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@b...> wrote:
Quoting Elliotte Harold :

> Sergio J. Rodriguez M. wrote:
>
> > If Namespaces are in fact a disaster, then why is widely used in any XML
> > Vocabulary, like RDF or OWL?
>
> Because we didn't know better six years ago. Some things you only learn
> from brutal experience.

We DID know better. Just nobody listened to us as old SGML fools.



Do You Yahoo!?
http://net.yahoo.com.mx: La mejor conexión a internet y 25MB extra a tu correo por http://net.yahoo.com.mx/.

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.