[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Partyin' like it's 1999

• To: 'David Carlisle' <davidc@n...>
• Subject: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:05:52 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

How do those browsers declare support for the 
namespaces? 

I like the IE means.   It is easy to build and 
share stylesheets that indicate precisely what 
is needed to support the author's intentions. 
I've not used the moz or ffox so I've not 
compared the means.

With new modalities coming online (eg, see 
the new xml.com article for voice markup), 
it becomes more pressing to converge on the 
means, at least for the sake of authors.

len


From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@n...]

It's also how mozilla (and netscape and firefox etc) work, in that case
without needing any proprietary declarations (and having native xhtml
rendering) MathML works out of the box and svg enabled builds of mozilla
are  available.

>   Yet I don't find schemas 
> for these perhaps because the schema would document 
> the object framework.  
> 

there's a dtd for xhtml+svg+mathml here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/

that currently doesnt have an xsd but says

  The possibility of combining those modules written in XML Schema
  [XMLSchema] might be explored when XML Schemas for XHTML
  [XHTMLMODSchema] and others become available and mature

in the mean time if you need a schema there's always trang...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by Date: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Previous by thread: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by thread: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread