[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Element declaring

• To: rsalz@d...
• Subject: Re: Element declaring
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:56:41 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0410140844240.22065-100000@s...>(message from Rich Salz on Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:44:49 -0400 (EDT))
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0410140844240.22065-100000@s...>

> Google for Gudge's open enumeration trick.

I must be missing something.

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200402/msg00011.html

says

  Legal values for MyData element include the QNames defined in the MyEnum
  and any other QName. 


what's the difference between that and just "any Qname".
The type is a union of a restricted type and that type's base type, isn't
that always just equivalent to the base type?


David



________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Element declaring
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Element declaring
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Element declaring
• Next by Date: Re: Element declaring
• Previous by thread: Re: Element declaring
• Next by thread: Re: Element declaring
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread