|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: EXSLT.NET 1.1
Elliotte Harold scripsit: > >EXSLT.NET is subject to GOTDOTNET WORKSPACES COMMERCIAL DERIVATIVES > >LICENSE - > > Has this license been approved or is it in the process of approval by > the open source initiative? I am not a license lawyer, but at first > glance, clause 6, which says patent rights don't extend to derivative > works, seems like it might be a problem. Thanks for spotting this. I don't speak for OSI, but as a member of the license-discuss list, I've spent plenty of time dissecting licenses. (I am not a lawyer; this is not legal advice.) No way in Hell this would pass OSI. What the general permission to make derivative works gives, clause 6 takes away. This license is pseudo-open and pseudo-free. In fact, it's exactly the same lame-o limitation that scuttled Sender ID in the IETF (google for details). Check out the Academic Free License at http://opensource.org/licenses/afl-2.1.php for what such a license ought to look like. -- Is a chair finely made tragic or comic? Is the John Cowan portrait of Mona Lisa good if I desire to see cowan@c... it? Is the bust of Sir Philip Crampton lyrical, www.ccil.org/~cowan epical or dramatic? If a man hacking in fury www.reutershealth.com at a block of wood make there an image of a cow, is that image a work of art? If not, why not? --Stephen Dedalus
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








