|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > It is completely possible to expose the schema or to expose > an interface schema that middleware then transforms into > the local schema. As you say, Thomas, mappings. BTW, why would I > need OWL to implement what is essentially a business object? If you are interested in describing your schema - which could well be the schema of special views or reports that you provide - you need to use some language. Mappings can be constructed when two kinds of information are known - 1) Identity - which primary key of one entity is equivalent to which key of another; 2) The semantics of terms and their relationships. 1) is hard, and has no general solution, but only specific ones. For 2) why not use some standard language, and if you do that, why not use OWL? OWL would not be "implementing" anything, but would contain needed data for the actual implementer. Cheers, Tom P -- Thomas B. Passin Explorer's Guide to the Semantic Web (Manning Books) http://www.manning.com/catalog/view.php?book=passin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart


![Re: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between](/images/get_stylus.gif)





