|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: are native XML databases needed?
> > the fact is: if you have to round-trip your XML to a client in order to query, > validate and or execute from it > > Are you suggesting that for retrieving XML an SQL server must pass its XML data > to the client, which executes the queries and validates documents -- as opposed > to the SQL server executing queries over XML data and validating documents? If a relational database has the capabilities to store XML documents without knowing the structure apriori, and lets you query (using XPATH and/or Xquery - not SQL), insert, update and delete nodes, subtrees or entire XML documents within and across all these XML documents stored in the DB, then I would put to you that you are not using a relational database, but what Cache calls a post-relational database. Do any of the big 3 (Oracle, DB2, MS SQL-Server) do that yet? Unless Yukon functionality has changed, it is the only one I am aware of that will (and that is not released yet). Please correct me if I am wrong. Relational databases did the same thing to Object databases in the 90's (although I think Objectstore still claims the worlds largest database :), and will eventually get there with XML, but by then they really will be much more than a relational database. Owen
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








