[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You

• To: "'Ken North'" <kennorth@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 00:17:14 +0100
• In-reply-to: <007f01c4308f$8dc98f70$1601a8c0@DURANTE>
• Thread-index: AcQwj27DjZOPR3WzScuINNj3WoBzBQAC/ivw

> If you get everyone working from the same conceptual model, 
> you'll have the
> uniformity that data dictionaries provided.


A data dictionary as I understood the term, and as it was generally
understood in the UK, was the place where you kept the conceptual model.

Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Models and containers
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>

• References:
  • Re: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>

• Prev by Date: schema versioning and RDDL
• Next by Date: Re: Models and containers
• Previous by thread: Re: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
• Next by thread: Re: Models and containers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread