[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that

• To: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 11:41:26 -0400
• Cc: "xml-dev DEV'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Booz Allen Hamilton
• References: <40965844.C8BF35A7@b...> <029E5D9C-9D17-11D8-9C3B-000A95CCC59E@x...>

Michael Champion wrote:
> 
> On May 3, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> > Below I referenced Chris Ferris' presentation - here's a link that
> > contains a PDF of it:
> >
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200404/msg00098.html
> >
> 
> Thanks Joe!
> 
> Can someone explain to me why these weren't just considered two inputs
> to an OASIS TC that would choose between them, or refactor them both
> into something better than either?  

Follow this thread, from July 2003 - it's the WSRM TC's response to the
announcement of the WS-ReliableMessaging Spec Workshop:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200307/msg00008.html

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Member, OASIS WSRM TC (but letting the e-mail archives speak for
themselves)
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World

> I don't understand this New World
> Order where specs are supposed to be completed before they go to a
> standards body and the market is supposed to choose among the competing
> inputs.  That's taking (not DesignByCommittee) a bit far, it would
> seem.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>

-- 
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
• Next by Date: Re: WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
• Previous by thread: WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
• Next by thread: Re: WS-RM vs WS-R -- was Re: [Fwd: Re: You call that a standard?]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread