RE: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for
So resurrect the SGML Declaration and enable everyone to declare compact syntaxes for the application profiles in the standard way. Why not have the compact syntaxes interoperate as well? If we are to brandish big pointy sticks, maybe they should be standard pointy sticks. Or are all of the arguments that led to the development of the SGML subset suddenly moot in a trendy way? len From: Norman Gray [mailto:norman@a...] Indeed not. I was just trying to detach the questions of compact syntaxes for input versus compact syntaxes for the wire, and defend the former against the accusation that it breaks interop. That accusation is a big pointy stick that (it seems) tends to get brandished with great enthusiasm whenever syntactical questions are raised.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format