Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures
At 4:28 PM -0700 4/8/04, Jeff Rafter wrote: >Man of extremes is right. Again I find myself on (what I assume will be) the >losing side of an argument : ) How can it possibly be argued that they are >harmful by nature? Because it is very common to need to create, either temporarily or permanently, invalid content. For instance, when I was writing Processing XML with Java in DocBook I typed many xinclude:include elements that were not provided for by the DocBook DTD. In other cases I've added custom elements and attributes that are not supplied by the DTD. And in other cases, I do want valid markup. I just don't want it yet. I'm not ready to fill in everything that's required. For instance, I might begin a book by typing out an outline as section titles, without actually giving the sections any content, though that is ultimately required. But I can probably put together an outline in day, even though filling in the content may take a year, as long as the editor doesn't keep bugging me about the missing parts. I've tried editors that attempt to maintain validity. And they're just bloody annoying. Even if you want valid markup, they're either pestering you with pop-ups; or filling in what they think you'll add and guessing wrong. (There's often more than one possible child element that can be added to make a parent element valid.) Bottom line: they get in your way. They are not smart enough to figure out what needs to be done, but they do something anyway. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format