|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Lx: compact syntax for XML
Greetings, On Sunday, April 18, 2004, at 10:19 PM, Rick Marshall wrote: > this may sound crazy, but every proposal i've seen so far to make xml > quicker/faster seems to rely on getting rid of the end tag. Ah, but I don't want to make XML `quicker/faster' for the machines (the other current thread here recognises that this is largely pointless in the vast majority of cases). I just want to make XML (specifically XSLT and occasional RDF) easier to read and write, and a bit easier for my editor to grok helpfully (and yes, I do use psgml). Thomas Passin's python-like syntax is nice, too, and similarly isomorphic to standard XML. The only difference is that Thomas's syntax doesn't leap out of the page at me, whereas the lispish syntax does. Thomas clearly does a lot more Python than I do, so maybe this is just a matter of habits and training, but it's this sort of `visual obviousness' that I'm after, that Lx has, and XML's angle brackets don't. It's not that I've got a downer on angle brackets -- I've been working with *ML long enough for that -- just that the decision to have XSL written in XML instance syntax means that XSL is a lot less legible, not to say downright ugly, than it has to be. All the best, Norman -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow norman@a...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








