|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for
On Apr 16, 2004, at 4:25 AM, Gerald Bauer wrote: Well, the point of XUL is that your forms designerSo...do you know of a good WYSIWYG forms designer that emits XUL? :) (I believe IB can now save to an XML format, but it's not XUL. Maybe someone will write a stylesheet that will translate from one to the other...?) I'm still not sure I buy the idea that a "compact" syntax makes things easier for Aunt Trudie, unless Trudie is already a C programmer. As I remember, the phenomenon was quite the opposite. When HTML appeared, a lot of previously non-technical people decided they could be a "web developer" as markup was a lot easier for them to understand than C or Fortran. If Trudie doesn't already know C, Python, or Lisp, why will a syntax that looks like one of those languages help her? I think your alternative syntaxes will appeal much more to old-school-why-do-I-need-a-GUI-autocompleting-syntax-coloring-bloated-thing-to-edit-a-text-file Unix heads. -jimbo Excelsior! XML Marshaller for Cocoa http://www.homepage.mac.com/jimbokun/Excelsior.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








