|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
Dare Obasanjo wrote: > the XML infoset is too granular to represent the > level of abstraction most real world applications > deal with XML. I may be reading this wrong. Please help me here. It appears to me that this could be re-worded as saying that "Infoset is too rich..." i.e. you seem to be saying that Infoset is overkill? I could understand if you objected to accomplishing the "smaller/faster" goals by using a method that was "underkill" (i.e. important information was lost) but I can't see why using an "overkill" method would be bad. bob wyman -----Original Message----- From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 2:18 PM To: Michael Champion; 'xml-dev' DEV Subject: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available I tend to agree with Tim, the XML infoset is too granular to represent the level of abstraction most real world applications deal with XML. Most real world applications use an abstraction of XML that is more akin to a subset of the XPath data model (elements, attributes, and text nodes). -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the Earth, minus 40% inheritance tax.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








