Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
 Having
composable namespaces does not ensure that the
implementations work. On the other hand, as I read the
document Dare gave us to reference, it should be easy
to
find out when they don't. To the tool users, all of these
services should be drag and drop items. The namespace
designers design according to the data being exchanged,
not
the implementations. The reason for some of the
more
complex WS specs is to provide assurances that
this
works blindly. How does a developer screw that
up?
I
can't tell what goes on in the minds of developers doing
the
implementing. I guess if they detest each other as
much
as some of the mail suggests, you might be right,
but if
so, they need to be laid off if they implement with
those
attitudes, and their work sent elsewhere. I don't
mind
if someone detests his web mate; I mind a great
deal
if they don't do the job they are paid to do.
So, we
are a pack of dogs? Ok.
But, that is why
WS registrars will vette code in accordance
with compliance and conformance test suites, and no
specification becomes a standard without one, and any
developer using unvetted web resources gets fired. Wow.
It
sure seems easier to mend fences and work together.
len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
