RE: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: You
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Michael Kay wrote: > > Look, the whole issue of openness is really a red > > herring. I can say that my process is completely open > > and anyone in the world can participate. But let's > > schedule my meetings every quarter and once in Tokyo > > and once in Berlin and once in Vienna and once in > > Vancouver and once in Washington. Effectively only > > the biggest players in the world can play. So, making > > it open, but making it infeasible to participate means > > it is, in effect, not open. > > But it's more open than the only alternative which is to hold 90% of your > meetings in the same continent. > > Michael Kay Yes, of course, from one perspective; but requiring a lot of F2F meetings on various continents effectively discriminates against participants in *all* regions if they cannot afford international travel. Use of the Internet (less so, telephone) is of great assist, for the S/standards orgs that are willing to allow the bulk of the real work, and voting, to be done electronically. It's no help at all if the companies who control the meeting agenda deliberately set up essential F2F meetings on various continents with the deliberate goal of excluding participation by small(er) companies and individuals. If someone said "a lot of international-scale standards work still tends to be US-centric," I would probably agree. -r
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format