[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binar

• To: <rjm@z...>, <bob@w...>
• Subject: RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 20:26:31 -0400
• Cc: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>, "'Robin Berjon'" <robin.berjon@e...>, "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <1081983903.2460.28.camel@z...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Marshall [mailto:rjm@z...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 19:05
> To: bob@w...
> Cc: 'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'; 'Robin Berjon'; 'xml-dev'
> Subject: RE:  RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: 
> RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
> 
> 
> bob
> 
> is there an open source tool for converting xml to ans.1? and 
> back too i guess.


I have heard that a web-based translation tool, based on X.694, will soon be
available on a website, but I don't have precise information about when and
where.

X.694 specifies a conversion from XML Schema to ASN.1, but not vice versa.

Alessandro Triglia


> 
> rick

• References:
  • RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xml editors
• Next by Date: Re: xml editors
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Next by thread: Re: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread