[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free

• To: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@i...>
• Subject: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:34:34 -0400
• Cc: "'Alessandro Triglia'" <sandro@m...>, "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <f5b8ygyz3p3.fsf@e...>
• Reply-to: <bob@w...>

Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> The W3C XML Schema Working Group is considering a
> proposal to add a datatype to the next version of
> W3C XML Schema which would distinguish e.g. 3.0
> from 3.00 _as values_.
	Apparently, there has also been some discussion in the ASN.1
standards group for defining a similar datatype for similar purposes.
It seems to me that it would be very useful for these two groups (W3C
XML Schema Working Group and ASN.1) to attempt to work together to
define a common datatype in this case. Given that the X.694 standard
defined by the ASN.1 group will probably need to be updated anyway if
W3C adds new datatypes to XSD, it seems clear that everyone's
interests would be served by working together on this one.

		bob wyman

• References:
  • Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: xml editors
• Next by Date: Re: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread