[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RSS beyond the Blog: 1992 or 1999? - was Re: hu

• To: 'Michael Champion' <mc@x...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: RSS beyond the Blog: 1992 or 1999? - was Re: hurry GenX...
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:20:48 -0600

Because I will think of it as that until told better, 
what is the difference?

Maybe I have a wrong idea of what can be done with the 
aggregator because my model is subscription/notification. 
For example, in my business, an agency/officer can subscribe to 
a record change or the entry of a record with some 
information of some kind (say, anytime some one makes 
a query with the name 'Len Bullard' in it).  That is 
likely beyond the sort of tech we are discussing here, yes?

len

From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@x...]

.... my point is mainly that "aggregation" of information that is 
unique to me is a bit of a misnomer, so I don't see the value of 
leveraging the RSS+Aggregator infrastructure to do that.  Better to 
build a real pub-sub network?

The 80/20 worse-is-better jabber comes in because one *could* think of 
RSS+Aggregators as a poor man's pub-sub network, but it scares me to 
use that philosophy for information that is intrinsically sensitive and 
time critical.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RSS beyond the Blog: 1992 or 1999? - was Re: [xml- dev] hurry GenX...
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: schema: error validation depending on global orlocal element declaration
• Next by Date: Re: RSS beyond the Blog: 1992 or 1999? - was Re: hurry GenX...
• Previous by thread: RE: RSS beyond the Blog: 1992 or 1999? - was Re: hurry GenX...
• Next by thread: Re: RSS beyond the Blog: 1992 or 1999? - was Re: [xml- dev] hurry GenX...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread