[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Schema Centric Canonicalization (was : Rich & Elliotte were right, I was

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Schema Centric Canonicalization (was : Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong)
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:55:31 -0800
• References: <ADA1E0AB9452BB48B063228627805EC901726EB1@R...> <4055F8C0.5060105@e...>

> > I can't wait for people to ask for WXS normalization.
>
> Wait no longer:
>
>    http://uddi.org/pubs/SchemaCentricCanonicalization.htm

Can anyone explain the case-insensitivity portion? I am not sure why
application level semantics should be foisted on a canonicalization
algorithm. It seems that because case-insensitivity cannot be expressed in
XML Schemas (per se... i.e., without a pattern restriction) that it
shouldn't make the spec. And while we are calling for canonicalization specs
to be side-by-side with validation specs, has anyone considered a
canonicalization mode for Schematron? That would be interesting...

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • RE: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
    • From: "Derek Denny-Brown" <derekdb@m...>
  • Re: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• Next by Date: How can I validate and parse Keyref Unique and minOccurs?
• Previous by thread: Re: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• Next by thread: Re: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread