[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) ofelements

• To: "'Pedro Salazar'" <pedro-b-salazar@p...>
• Subject: RE: schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) ofelements
• From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@w...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:30:56 -0500
• Cc: "'XML DEV'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1077297669.16732.22.camel@v...>
• Organization: Datypic
• Thread-index: AcP31Z7AaIDc477qT1ybjOxqAZ+a8wAAYm3Q

Ah, you need to add the med: prefix in your XPath, so it should be 

med:serviceImport|med:serviceExport

Priscilla
-----------------------------------------------------
Priscilla Walmsley             priscilla@w...
Author, Definitive XML Schema     (Prentice Hall PTR)
-----------------------------------------------------  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pedro Salazar [mailto:pedro-b-salazar@p...] 
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 12:21 PM
> To: Priscilla Walmsley
> Cc: 'XML DEV'
> Subject: RE:  schema validate key uniqueness 
> attribute (name) ofelements
> 
> On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 17:02, Priscilla Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > I think you want serviceImport|serviceExport instead of
> > serviceImport/serviceExport in your path.  
> > 
> > The "|" operator means "serviceImport or serviceExport", 
> while the slash
> > means that it is looking for a serviceExport child of serviceImport.
> > 
> > Priscilla
> 
> I fixed that but the validation is still OK (not detecting 
> the repeating
> data on the name attribute -> key) on XERCES2 (parser) and Oxygen
> (tool).
> 
> However, do you agree the right definition of the schema to 
> validate my
> purpose? 
> 
> thanks,
> Pedro Salazar.
> -- 
> -PS
> 
> 

• References:
  • RE: schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) ofelements
    • From: Pedro Salazar <pedro-b-salazar@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: JSR 206 and SAX
• Next by Date: Re: JSR 206 and SAX
• Previous by thread: RE: schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) ofelements
• Next by thread: RE: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread