[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:54:02 -0500
• In-reply-to: <p06010203bc5e7d2c10d0@[192.168.254.4]>
• References: <4038BC93.7040905@a...><p06010203bc5e7d2c10d0@[192.168.254.4]>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> was heard to say:
| At 9:28 AM -0500 2/22/04, David Megginson wrote:
|
|>- add a feature to XMLReaderFactory, such as
|>   http://xml.org/sax/features/unicode-normalization-checking; most
|>   appropriate at the factory level (Norm Walsh, 2004-02-19); Jeff
|>   Rafter (2004-02-19) and Elliotte Rusty Harold (2004-02-19) disagree;
|>   Norm wants feature in factory so that factory can return different
|>   parsers (2004-02-20)
|
| It's not so much that I object to doing it on the factory, as that the
| XMLReaderFactory has no setFeature/setProperty/getFeature/getProperty
| methods. THerefore it's not possible within SAX as currently designed.
| Perhaps we should add these methods to XMLReaderFactory. However,
| that's a bigger change that should be considered on its own merits,
| with a range of use cases, rather than being shoe-horned in to support
| this one need. I doubt that could be reasonably pulled off in Norm's
| time frame.

Right. I concede that it'll have to be on the XMLReader and
implementations will just have to deal with it.

| I suspect Norm was thinking of adding this to SAXParserFactory, a

No, I meant the XMLReaderFactory, but I had neglected to check that it
had features.

| hideous, evil monstrosity of a class that should be hung, shot,
| beheaded, drawn and quartered, burned at the stake, buried in
| unconsecrated ground, dug up, cremated, and the ashes tossed in the
| Tiber while the complete cast of Wicked sings "Ding dong, the witch is
| dead." 

Go on, tell us how you really feel. So you'd be discouraging the EG from
adding the feature to the SAXParserFactory, then? :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@n...> | Words--so innocent and powerless they
http://nwalsh.com/            | are, as standing in a dictionary, how
                              | potent for good and evil they become,
                              | in the hands of one who knows how to
                              | use them!--Nathaniel Hawthorne

PGP signature

• References:
  • SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
  • Re: SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Next by Date: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization
• Next by thread: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread