[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation

• To: "'ari@c...'" <ari@c...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:18:23 -0800

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ari@c... [mailto:ari@c...] 
>Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 9:55 PM
>To: xml-dev@l...
>Subject: Re:  A question about REST and transaction isolation
>...
>
>Speaking of browsers, is there a good reason they only support GET and
>POST? I mean the HTML DTD only has these two as legal values for the
>method attribute on FORM, but is there a reason for that?

XForms-compliant browsers [1] support a variety of submission methods,
including HTTP PUT, and XForms allows for extensions in the value of
submission method attribute.

Leigh.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: hello
• Next by Date: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Previous by thread: RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Next by thread: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread