• To: "XML DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:14:39 +0000
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D51848@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D51848@R...>

At 17:13 03/02/2004, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>I disagree. Most tools insert this date automatically. I'd be very 
>suspicious of a tool that allowed users to directly edit the posting date 
>of an entry, let alone edit the original + posting date.


Some tools are called people Dare... or
should that be the other way round?
   That kind of tool doesn't put in the date automatically.

>  I agree with Bob that having a published + updated date would be useful.


For tools perhaps.
When people author material its boring to put in the date 3 times.
rightly or wrongly.


regards DaveP.

• References:
  • RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: bestpractice for providing newsfeeds ?)
• Next by Date: Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?)
• Previous by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread