|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
> Yes. It's very careful to check that every document results in a > startDocument and an endDocument event, even in the face of a fatal > error. This is one of the most common mistakes that SAX parsers make. I brought this up because of a question I had asked a short while ago in this thread: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200312/threads.html#00345 It was never adequately answered. And one could read the docs to imply that if the start of the document is never encountered then neither should be called but an error may be thrown-- of course even that is flimsy-- consider the following document: Error Before Prolog.xml ================= Venienti occurrite morbo <?xml version="1.0"?> <foo/> Error In Prolog.xml ================= <?xml version="Venienti occurrite morbo"?> <foo/> What do the SAX documents actually prescribe in this case? If I am delving too deeply into things covered your talk, then I am happy to wait : ) Cheers, Jeff Rafter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








