[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: semantics in schema (xsd)

• To: "'Liam Quin'" <liam@w...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:44:23 -0000
• In-reply-to: <20040227155758.GX27421@w...>
• Thread-index: AcP9SoxQCDaIqoZfQ0iEi+uuLrYw3AA3sqTw

# 
# These are all examples of the software applying too rigid a test
# and failing with real-world data.
# 

Every example of an integrity constraint that I have ever seen in a database
textbook has been flawed, in the sense that it fails the test "are there any
conceivable circumstances in which this constraint could prevent me
representing the state of the real world accurately". In practice, such
integrity constraints (and the same goes for XML Schemas) are there for two
purposes: (a) to detect data that is more likely to be wrong than right, and
(b) to protect the receiving software from having to deal with situations
that it hasn't been designed to cope with. If you think you are describing
situations that can't happen in the real world, you are probably deluding
yourself.

(An example. A retail system in France kept rejecting a particular
transaction. It was programmed to reject the sale of an item that would make
the stock level negative: i.e. the supermarket couldn't sell more of an item
than it had bought. On investigation, it turned out that the product in
question was live fish, and they were breeding in the tank).

Michael Kay

• References:
  • Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
    • From: 'Liam Quin' <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again
• Next by Date: RE: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again
• Previous by thread: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Next by thread: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread