[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec

• To: mbatsis@n...
• Subject: Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 05:10:07 -0800
• Cc: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <403DDD04.6000103@n...>
• Organization: liveSTORYBOARD
• References: <20040226111707.60740.qmail@w...> <403DDD04.6000103@n...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) wrote:

> 
> Gerald,
> 
> IMHO we don't need another spec. What we do need (and I agree with my 
> interpretation of Robin Berjon's post here) is more implementations of 
> existing standards that will free us from vendor lockin. Where is the 
> browser that will render a mixed, XForms based XHTML++SVG+MathML 
> document? Where is my XForms2XUL or XForms2XHTML converter?
> 
> All I want to point out is that there is no need for more standards when 
> we are so far behind on implementing the basics.
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Manos
> 
> PS: What's not free regarding Mozilla's XUL+XBL implementation? I would 
> avoid putting Moz in the mini-vendor empire list.
> 

Have you seen:

http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/control.htm

Mozilla in IE :)

best,
-Rob

• References:
  • A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XUL Spec
    • From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>
  • Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XULSpec
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: parsing xsl file in java
• Next by Date: Re: XML test documents
• Previous by thread: Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XULSpec
• Next by thread: SVG Can't Replace XUL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread