|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: re: genx
I agree. Having written something similar in the past (closed source for my employer) it's worth keeping it simple, or you'll end up implementing the whole of DOM, a modular stream interface, etc. I also agree a look at expat - it would be very useful if expat and genex worked well together. I really like the simplicity of the Perl XML::Writer module - there may be some ideas on pretty-printing which are worth taking: http://search.cpan.org/~edavis/XML-Writer-0.4.1/Writer.pm Finally, good luck! Paul -----Original Message----- From: David Tolpin [mailto:dvd@d...] Sent: 21 January 2004 08:51 To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: re: genx Tim, rant: many comments sent are making genx.h more complex. My feeling is that it is already at the required level of complexity or above, and should be kept as simple or made simpler. error handling: what about not returning error conditions? Predicates (check...) return either 0 or !0, it is clear. But what's the use of error codes in writers? If it's use is in error handling, then an error_handler(void *userData, int errno) can be passed to the API. The user can easily do longjmp, exit(), abort(), or whatever there. The default error handler would perror() and exit(). David ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








