|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Postel's law, exceptions
jcowan@r... wrote: > Nevertheless, it sounds like you have contractual relationships with two groups of > (legal) persons: those who provide content to you (and do not pay), and those who > receive content (and pay). If you had no contracts with the former group, you > wouldn't be able to publish their documents; if you had none with the latter > group, they wouldn't be obliged to pay. No, really, we have contractual relationships with only one class of customer for this service: those who pay us to publish specific documents. An annex to the contract describes how we know that documents are emitted and how we may gain access to those documents. Our customer warrants to us that he has the authority to grant us access to those documents. By what contractual arrangement (to which we are not party) our customer acquires that authority is of only tangential interest to us. There are, of course, also plenty straightforward cases where the documents a customer pays us to publish are entirely his own.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








