[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• From: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:15:23 +1100
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0401242003010.19941-100000@s...>
• Mail-followup-to: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>,xml-dev@l...
• References: <4D05972C-4ED1-11D8-B206-000A95A51C9E@t...> <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0401242003010.19941-100000@s...>

Rich Salz wrote:
> Why not at least set things up so that (a) those who get their documentation
> from the header file know what's going on; and (b) those who want to break
> the rules will at least be forced to "admit" (via const-cast) that they are
> doing so.

+1.

• References:
  • Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: transforming between XML data and HTML form
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Previous by thread: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• Next by thread: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread