[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?

• To: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@s...>
• Subject: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:04:27 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcPoShjQRrMRf6UKSZOaF/A/gipKLQABHp6F
• Thread-topic: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?

First mover advantage was a bogus term even when it was used in context (during the height of the dot bomb era) let alone when used to describe something as mundane as site syndication formats. 
 
-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the Earth, minus 40% inheritance tax. 

________________________________

From: Bill Kearney [mailto:wkearney@s...]
Sent: Sat 1/31/2004 2:27 PM
To: Dare Obasanjo
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  best practice for providing newsfeeds ?




Indeed, those unsure of how to follow along and implement things in a
collarborative fashion may well want to sit this round out until the braver
souls do the hard work.  By sitting it out however, they'll likely lose
first-mover advantages but I suppose one can't have everything.

-Bill Kearney
Syndic8.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
Subject: RE:  best practice for providing newsfeeds ?


Considering that the spec is currently a draft and still full of ambiguity I'm
curious as to what is meant by "support ATOM".

• Prev by Date: Re: Schema fragments for everyday stuff
• Next by Date: Uniform Context Transfer Protocol?
• Previous by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by thread: SIRs should be filed for many concepts.... (was Re: Patents, schmatents (was: hi))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread