On Jan 21, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Rich Salz wrote: > Why not just do everything in UTF-8. All this wchar_t, "asdfasdf"L > support, etc., is going to complicate the API. Seems simpler to have > the basic API, and for those not working in UTF-8 (or its subset:), > they only have to remember a single consistent rule: call "convert()" > first. Now that's an attractive idea. I'd still probably retain the genxCharacter(genxWriter * w, int character) because I've seen all sorts of situations where you know what the U+ value is and just want to stuff that character into the stream. -Tim
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format