|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: When Searching With Google
I apologize if I am bringing up anything new here. I just joined the list today, and I have only caught the last few messages in this thread. In any case, I thought this link might be useful, as it gives a good abstract as to how Google prioritizes search results. http://www.google.com/technology/index.html Chris Strolia-Davis Database Specialist Contractor - CDO Technologies Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:41 PM To: Bullard, Claude L (Len) Cc: xml-dev@l... Subject: RE: When Searching With Google Len, I guess I understand now what you are saying precisely; I cannot agree with you more.. excellent point. best, murali. On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Interpret, yes, but also to enable selection of visualization techniques > in adaptive graphical user interfaces. As the next generation of > adaptive interfaces emerges, we need to know more about the sources, > their policies (eg, algorithms) to enable the system to dynamically > select the interface model. That's a side jaunt, but what was on my > mind while I was walking the dog. > > To be clear, I am not singling out Google as having become proprietary; > I think that if we look around, we'll find non-deterministic aspects in > many search engines, and possibly, **web services in general**. I used > Google as the example because of realizing that my own mental model of > the search interface is likely incorrect with how Google actually > processes terms that I enter. The rest is a follow on from that > realization. Part of that realization was that the metadata being > derived is probably skewed as well, but how would one know? > > We say we can build web services as encapsulated systems and we can; yet > that old bugaboo of trust but verify keeps popping back up. It is as if > we need a model for adaptive paranoia which is what contracting > processes are. > > len > > From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...] > > I think Len is arguing that if we know more about how google searches, we > can interpret the results more.. such as in germany, I get german pages > etc.. > > I think several techniques used by google are kind of known..?? for > example, we know that it uses page rank, text in anchor tags, tf-idf etc.. > but we do not know the exact numbers, and we do not know other metrics > used etc.. > > I think the question is: has google crossed the line with respect to what > is proprietary and what is disclosed. I think Len argues that it has.. > ... Chris Strolia-Davis (E-mail).vcf
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








