[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: repercussions

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: repercussions
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:07:00 +0100
• In-reply-to: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E529380D1@R...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E529380D1@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Joshua Allen wrote:
> Right.  I don't think many people rely on qnames in content, or when
> they do only for very limited scenarios.

If "content" includes "attribute values", there is a prominent
counter example: XSLT, which happens to rely on XPath.

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • RE: repercussions
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: repercussions
• Next by Date: Re: repercussions
• Previous by thread: RE: repercussions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread