Re: DTD and Schema Teasers
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Two only slightly related questions: > 2. What are good reasons for having multiple schemas for the same > instance? This is something we're running into in the justice data model effort (justicexml.gtri.gatech.edu). We have a fundamental conflict between two schools: 1. Shared schema: This provides a common definition for syntax and use of the data dictionary. 2. Document-specific schemas: These state document / implementation-specific constraints on a document. It's a fine line to walk. (1) is trying to solve the problem of allowing machines to say things that can be understood, and (2) is trying to prevent machines from saying things outside a desired data space. We've found that when attempting to apply document-specific constraints, you pretty much have to throw out the concept of common schemas and reused types. For example, if one part of a document defines a type one way, another part of the document can't define that type another way. And there seems to be no way in XMLSchema to manage common / reusable schema components in tandem with application-specific constraints. One solution might be to disallow use of type-referencing in instance documents (use of xsi:type=), and pass over instances with validation against multiple schemas. That makes reuse of global element definitions difficult, among other things. We're starting to lean towards a solution like schematron for a solution, but that steps away from the desired minimum toolset, and requires a good bit of sophistication from the users. Webb Roberts (webb.roberts@g...) Research Scientist Georgia Tech Research Institute
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format