[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: xml, books

• To: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: xml, books
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:06:12 +0200
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20031016165510.0285e800@p...>
• References: <r02000200-1028-9AFB881CFF7111D7A2980003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <r02000200-1028-9AFB881CFF7111D7A2980003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <5.2.0.9.2.20031016165510.0285e800@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Dave Pawson wrote:
> The conclusion was that readers place different value on
> a print book and the same content on the web.
...
>  I'm curious what this group of 'readers' think of this evaluation.

Printed books and really good online materials have a different
structure.

A book makes a linear reading, and you need TOC(s) and indices
for cross references. Course material must be written in a linear
form.

A well designed online information matrial is usually a sensibly
cross linked network of information. Which makes it hard to
print it out because it must be linearized in the process.
And of course this needs quite a different writing style.

We came near this some time ago when we discussed the structure
of your XSL FAQ...

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • Re: Re: xml, books
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: xml, books
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: xml, books
• Next by Date: Tool for navigating xml schema's
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: xml, books
• Next by thread: Re: Re: xml, books
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread