|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] FW: WWW, SW and the Chaos Theory (was RE: Beyond Ontologies)
Hi. I was following this thread and some crazy thoughts came in mind... <quote see="[1]"> An object which is chaotic in space is called a *fractal*. There are many possible definitions of the word fractal. A very loose and general definition is this: a fractal is a geometric figure that does not become simpler when you analyze it into smaller and smaller parts. <hr /> A system whose configuration is capable of changing with time is known as a *dynamical system*. A dynamical system consists of some *variables* and some *equations of motion* or *dynamical equations*. The variables are any things which can vary with time. They can be multiple or single, continuous or discrete. They must be chosen in such a way that complete knowledge of all the variables determines uniquely the *state* of the system at one time. In other words, two similar systems with the same values of all the variables are in identical configurations now, and will evolve identically. The set of all possible values of the variables, i.e. the set of all possible states of the system, is called the *phase space*. The present state of the system is one point in phase space. As time proceeds, this point moves in phase space. The job of the equations of motion is to determine how it moves. Given the present state of the system in phase space, the equations of motion tell you how you can calculate the state at the next instant of time. As time evolves, this point describes a *trajectory* or an *orbit* in phase space. If you know how to calculate this trajectory, you say that you have solved the equations of motion. Usually, you are given the state of the system at some initial time; this is called the *initial conditions*. Then you try to calculate the trajectory which follows from these initial conditions. The signature of time-chaos is something called *sensitivity to initial conditions*. ... </quote> [1] "Chaos, Complexity, and Entropy (A physics talk for non-physicists)". Michel Baranger. Center for Theoretical Physics, Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA and New England Complex Systems Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA MIT-CTP-3112. ... this crazy thoughts: a) Can we define the World Wide Web (WWW) as a "dynamical system" in Chaos Theory? b) Or, can we define the WWW as fractal? Not that we can draw it into a graphic shape, but, because does not become simpler when you analyze it into smaller and smaller parts (web sites or a set of disparate resources -HTML pages, XML documents, binary data, etc.-). c) Can we define the principal variables of the "dynamical system" WWW as the resources and URIs that identify them (among others)? d) Can we relate the equations of motion to the ontologies of the Semantic Web? Cheers, Sergio. PD: Sorry, if this has no sense at all... just some philosophical ideas...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








