[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: syntax, model

• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: syntax, model
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:23:34 -0400
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <47DA249C-0656-11D8-9BFD-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• References: <47DA249C-0656-11D8-9BFD-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> 2. It's useful documentation, there are those who really find schemas
>    easier to read than instances.  Weird but true.

Not weird, since any set of instances is unlikely to show, e.g., what 
the values of minOccurs/maxOccurs might be, defaulted attributes, etc.
	/r$
(PS:  Leaving the individual names out of courtesy, although experience 
shows that both will bounce.  Sigh, it [expletive deleted] what spam has brought us to.)

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Next by Date: Re: syntax, model
• Previous by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Next by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread