|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: UTF-8+names
--- "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote: > mc@x... (Mike Champion) writes: > >No more than any other non-trivial encoding, which > gets in to deep > >philosophical territory about whether "Ë?" is the > same as "oe" :-) Well, there's the problem in a hard little nutshell -- the assumption of 127-bit "characters" is still extremely deeply rooted in a LOT of the software that we (at least in North America) have to deal with every day, like it or not. > > This makes me laugh hysterically, as the original > notion of Unicode was > to develop a big enough space that all the > characters could live in > happy co-existence without need for layering in the > character space. Sure! The question is how to do something to make our lives less unpleasant while The System plots forward. Be patient, vote with our feet against crappy software that can't handle Unicode decently, or try to hack up something in the interim? The whole point of Unicode encodings is to map conveniently enterable text onto codepoints, and whatever the technical virtues or flaws of Tim's strawman proposal, this seems like the right layer to address it. > The wart has remained in XML because the W3C hasn't > dared address > entities directly, The "W3C" (which after all is a few thousand different people with very different ideas) has been wrestling with this for years, the trouble is that no very great ideas have come up AFAIK. What's you're Wart-Off suggestion?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








