[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: syntax, model

• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: syntax, model
• From: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:44:20 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p06002000bbbecadb5785@[192.168.254.4]>
• References: <r02000200-1028-7845750605A911D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <E1ACrp5-0001Bh-00@canteen> <p06002000bbbecadb5785@[192.168.254.4]>

On Friday 24 October 2003 08:50, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> >On Thursday 23 October 2003 18:37, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> >>  Thanks, but sharing data models remains something that sounds great but
> >>  is deeply pernicious when examined closely.
> >
> >So are you against any schema technology on principle? If not, why
> >not? How exactly does the thing described by a schema differ from
> >a data model?
>
> That's a non-sequitur. Why would you think Simon is opposed to any
> schema technology on principle just because he's opposed to sharing
> data models?

Because a schema is a decription of a data model to be shared with
others. I assume you disagree. If so, please answer the original
question: "How exactly does the thing described by a schema differ
from a data model?"

Tyler

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>
  • Re: syntax, model
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: syntax, model
• Next by Date: RE: syntax, model
• Previous by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Next by thread: Re: syntax, model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread