Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
On Friday 03 October 2003 15:06, Rich Salz wrote: > > Are you saying it doesn't make sense to ask why ASN.1 has been > > vulnerable to long-lived bugs? We are not talking about just one > > bug in just one implementation. > > In every case so far, it's been untested code paths. As others have > said, that's not ASN1/[BDPX]ER's fault. What if the design of ASN1/[BDPX]ER yields many more code paths than other designs? Is that a design flaw? Tyler -- The union of REST and capability-based security: http://www.waterken.com/dev/Web/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format