[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:00:59 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-248BFA7404D611D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <20031022211207.GB24300@w...> <r02000200-1028-248BFA7404D611D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> (XML Core is not one of the parts of the W3C renowned for its openness,
> I'm afraid.)

Very true, and nobody hates that more than I do.

-- 
Using RELAX NG compact syntax to        John Cowan
develop schemas is one of the simple    http://www.reutershealth.com
pleasures in life....                   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Jeni Tennison                 <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Next by Date: Re: Backslash n [OT] was Line Separator and Paragraph Separator
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Next by thread: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread