[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?

• To: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Subject: Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:59:38 -0500
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Booz Allen Hamilton
• References: <DC65AE678B89004B9CCB202E19482CC73BBC0B@m...> <3F9FC613.CD17A0A7@b...> <6.0.0.22.2.20031029141423.02929b20@p...> <3F9FCF07.B665BB3E@b...> <6.0.0.22.2.20031029145056.02933210@p...>

<Quote>
For accessibility, the presentational form has to vary to meet end user
need, yet here they mandate binding them.
</Quote>

Are these two requirements (varying the presentational form to meet user
needs and binding presentation with content and context) orthogonal?

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

Dave Pawson wrote:
> 
> At 14:30 29/10/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi Dave,
> >
> >We certainly can't assume that all electronic forms are accessible. Of
> >course, given that this was a federal-sponsored initiative accessibility
> >was one of the main topics. There was an Accessibility subteam
> >(described in more detail in the URL I provided in my previous e-mail),
> >and one of the recommendations at the end states that it should be
> >ensured that "e-forms support Section 508 accessibility requirements.
> >This is a critical requirement, mandated by law.".
> 
> So combining that with
> 
> > > >addition, any signature must be applied to this combination of
> > > >presentation, content, and context, and the authentication process must
> > > >ensure integrity.
> 
> That's what has me confused.
>   For accessibility, the presentational form has to vary to meet end user need,
> yet here they mandate binding them.
> 
> Must be gov logic:-)
> 
> regards DaveP

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@b...
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>

• References:
  • RE: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
    • From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@o...>
  • Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve
• Next by Date: Re: Semantics, Complex Systems, (XSLT) Programs which Write Themselves
• Previous by thread: Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
• Next by thread: Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread