[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")

• To: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Subject: Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:38:29 +0100
• Cc: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <3F689FE0.5000602@s...>
• References: <3F689FE0.5000602@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> I've posted code and performance results for my XBIS format (originally 
> XML Stream) on Sourceforge at http://xbis.sourceforge.net/ I think the 
> performance results are worth looking at for anyone who is open to 
> alternative representations for XML.

This is interesting stuff Dennis, thanks for publishing the results. 
But there is no alternative representation of XML. I think you mean 
alternative representation of an XML Infoset.

It's arguably unhelpful to have workshops titled as to talking about 
Binary XML when what they're going to be taking about are Binary 
Infosets. Can y'all sort out your terminology, so as to keep the 
waters clear?

Bill de hÓra
-- 
Technical Architect
Propylon
http://www.propylon.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• References:
  • Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
    • From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
• Next by Date: Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
• Previous by thread: Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
• Next by thread: Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread