|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Longhorn, SVG and YAXUIL
They
may be planning something more than a 2D vector language. If they use
SVG,
all they have is SVG. If they extend it, they get beat to death for doing
that. If they don't use it, they get beat on for not doing that but
at least they
have
used XML as it is intended to be used.
I have
no information about any of the above. I only want to make the
point
that
conformance with XML and conformance with standards does not
equal
conformance with any given application language be it SVG, X3D,
HTML,
whatever. Keep in mind, it is the object model semantics, not
the
markup schema that determines what one can do with an application.
If
they need extended or different semantics, they don't have any choice but
to
route around SVG.
Otherwise, why would RELAX NG be posed as a competitor to XML Schema
and
XML Schema to DTDs? S.O.P. Proprietary object models aren't going
away.
len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








