|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Joining the church
Tim Bray wrote: > [...] someone said they needed a schema for the son-of-RSS work, and I > volunteered. [...] (Details at > http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/07/09/PieSchema01 Thank you for taking the initiative! This was sorely needed. > but it's not a very interesting schema). I for one think it's very interesting indeed! I've been trying to grasp the essence of not-echo, but lacking a concise description it's been a rough slog across the Wiki and dozens of weblogs (and altogether _too much_ Viewing Source). The schema helps a lot. BTW, regarding: | The following need removal forthwith, simply because | previous generations syndication technology got by without them just fine, | and we're not here to invent stuff: | | subtitle Exactly what can we not do if we don't have this? | What prior art demonstrates its necessity? I thought the analogy "title, subtitle, summary" == "head, deck, lead" provided a compelling use case, with ample precedent in newspaper and magazine publishing. Most people probably won't use 'subtitle', but it could be very important for those who can make use of it. Another thing to consider: since one of the use cases is single-author weblogs, it might be worthwhile to allow 'author' and 'contributor' as direct children of a 'feed'. But I'm not really involved in the blogging world other than as an occasional reader, so take this for what it's worth. --Joe English jenglish@f...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








